Proceedings articles often contain one or more pages, figures and tables and describe details of the research undertaken. Preprints see below or abstracts without figures or tables and less than words are not considered prior publications. If authors choose to submit their manuscript elsewhere before a final decision has been made on its suitability for publication in ABE, they should first withdraw it from ABE. Submission to the journal implies that the manuscript is original work.
The journal may use software to screen manuscripts for unoriginal content. By submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors agree to this screening.
To support the wide dissemination of research, the journal encourages authors to post their research manuscripts on community-recognized preprint servers, either before or alongside submission to the journal. This policy applies only to the original version of a manuscript that describes primary research.
Instead, forward links to the published manuscript may be posted on the preprint server. When assessing the novelty of a manuscript submitted to the journal, the editors will not be influenced by other manuscripts that are posted on community-recognized preprint servers after the date of submission to ABE or after the date of posting on a preprint server, if the manuscript is submitted to the journal within 4 months.
Note that authors should meet all the criteria above; those who do not meet all criteria should be mentioned in the Acknowledgements section, not added as an author. In addition, authors must be able to identify who is responsible for all parts of the submitted work. Submission to the journal implies that all authors have seen and approved the author list.
Changes to the author list after manuscript submission — such as the insertion or removal of author names, or a rearrangement of author order — must be approved by all authors and the editor. Authors may digitally manipulate or process images, but only if the adjustments are kept to a minimum, are applied to the entire image, meet community standards, and are clearly described in the manuscript.
All images in a manuscript must accurately reflect the original data on which they are based. Authors must not move, remove, add or enhance individual parts of an image. The editors reserve the right to request original, unprocessed images from the authors. Failure to provide requested images may result in a manuscript being rejected or retracted. If a manuscript includes previously published material, the authors must obtain permission from the copyright owners and the publisher of the original work to reproduce it.
The authors must cite the original work in their manuscript. Copies of all reproduction permissions must be included with the manuscript when it is first submitted to the journal. Authors must disclose the source of publicly available data and materials, such as public repositories or commercial manufacturers, by including accession numbers or company details in their manuscript, as appropriate.
Authors may make their own data and materials available in Supplementary Material, or by linking from their manuscript to relevant community-recognized public databases or digital repositories. All data sets must be made available in full to the editors and reviewers during the peer review process, and must be made publicly available by the date of publication.
Authors commit to preserving their data sets for at least five years from the date of publication in the journal. The journal encourages authors to grant reasonable requests from colleagues to share any data, materials and experimental protocols described in their manuscript. Where relevant, the authors must include a statement in their manuscript that describes the procedures for obtaining informed consent from participants regarding participation in the research and publication of the research.
Anonymity must be strictly maintained for the protection of personal information. In addition, the research must be undertaken in accordance with applicable international and national laws and guidelines. The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject manuscripts when high ethical standards are not maintained, even if formal approval for work has been obtained.
The journal adheres to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ICMJE policy on Clinical Trials Registration and the CONSORT statement , which recommend that all clinical trials are registered in a public trials registry in a standard format, at or before the time of first patient enrollment, as a condition of consideration for publication.
Manuscripts describing clinical trials must include the registration number of the trial and the name of the trial registry. Study types include, but are not limited to, randomized trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, case reports, qualitative research, diagnostic and prognostic studies, economic evaluations, animal pre-clinical studies and study protocols.
In the interests of transparency, the journal requires all authors to declare any conflicts of interest in relation to their submitted manuscript. Potential conflicts include but are not limited to competing commercial or financial interests, commercial affiliations, consulting roles, or ownership of stock or equity. Each author must complete and submit a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, and the corresponding author should upload all the forms as a PDF file when submitting a manuscript.
Authors should list all funding sources for their work in the Acknowledgements. For each funding source, both the research funder and the grant number should be given.
The journal maintains the confidentiality of all unpublished manuscripts. ABE keeps the editorial process confidential, including whether a manuscript has been received or under review, the contents, the status of review, and any criticism provided by reviewers. Reviewers of ABE also agree to keep the review process confidential. By submitting their manuscript to the journal, the authors warrant that they will keep all correspondence about their manuscript from the Editorial Office, editors and reviewers similarly in strict confidence.
When a manuscript is submitted to the journal, it is assigned to the Editor-in-Chief, who performs initial screening. The assigned Editor invites two reviewers who are selected according to the field of the submitted manuscript. If the opinions of the reviewers diverge greatly, a third reviewer may be asked to review the manuscript.
The Editor-in-Chief then makes the first decision. If the decision is to request revision of the manuscript, authors have 3 months to resubmit their revised manuscript. Revised manuscripts submitted after this deadline will be withdrawn and treated as new submissions.
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for making the final decision on each manuscript. It should be noted that a second round or more of revisions may be required if necessary. The members of the International Advisory and Editorial Boards act in advisory roles, providing feedback as reviewers and making suggestions to improve the journal. When submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors may suggest reviewers that they would like included in or excluded from the peer review process.
The Editor may consider these suggestions but is under no obligation to follow them. For example, if the comments contain offensive language, confidential information or recommendations for publication. The society executive will not become involved in editorial decisions, except in cases of a fundamental breakdown of process.
Authors who believe that an editorial decision has been made in error may lodge an appeal with the Editorial Office. Appeals are considered only if the authors provide detailed evidence of a misunderstanding or mistake by a reviewer or editor. Appeals are considered carefully by the Editor-in-Chief, whose decision is final. Such circumstances might include having a personal or professional relationship with an author, working on the same topic or in direct competition with an author, or having a financial stake in the work or its publication.
An editor who declares a conflict of interest is unassigned from the manuscript in question and is replaced by a new editor.
A published article that contains an error may be corrected through the publication of an Erratum. Errata describe errors that significantly affect the scientific integrity of a publication, the reputation of the authors, or the journal itself.
Authors who wish to correct a published article should contact the editor who handled their manuscript or the Editorial Office with full details of the error s and their requested changes. In cases where co-authors disagree over a correction, the Editor-in-Chief may consult the Editorial Board or external peer reviewers for advice. If an Erratum is published, any dissenting authors will be noted in the text. A published article that contains invalid or unreliable results or conclusions, has been published elsewhere, or has infringed codes of conduct covering research or publication ethics may be retracted.
Incubators, Infants 3. Ventilators 4. Anesthesia machines 5. Lab equipment 6. Medical imaging equipment. Hospital Management Information Systems. Software and Hardware Courses Some of the offered courses are : 1. Networking 2. Internet Programming 3. Multimedia 3D studio, Adobe Photoshop,. Introduction , Windows 95 and Windows 98 6. Our clients include both sides, defendants and plaintiffs, as well as insurers associated with large variety of medical products and accessories.
Optimal healthcare technology management over its life-cycle requires expertise and specific application of strategy in each of the stages that include: ideation, design, quality validation, testing and trials, regulatory compliance such as FDA regulations , market launching, hospital commissioning, training, installation, technical support, maintenance, repairs, upgrades, integration, post market review, retirement and replacement, and after-market and off-label use.
Translation of an idea into a safe and effective product requires integrated knowledge from several areas.
0コメント