Or do you adopt these tweaks as single-purpose classes that can predictably override component styles? To address the scope and specificity issue, utility classes are set to trump component styles.
This allows for overrides that relate with components in a predictable manner. Instead of defining components from the outset based on intuition, classes are added to markup as needed. Then, code can be abstracted as patterns emerge. Yet it still works within the atomic concept, since it is a low-level class that can be reused.
How well these new classes are integrated into the overall system is dependent on the atomic framework being used. The problem is that this step of abstracting atomic classes is optional and cannot be enforced by the framework. When patterns are abstracted after-the-fact, design consistency is in danger.
How do you know if a style combination has already been used? Searching the codebase is near pointless as the many classes are used all over and can be arranged in any order. Continually analyzing patterns inside markup gets tiring and takes time.
Yet abstraction is key in the process for styles or interfaces that will evolve over time. Rarely will either methodology be the perfect fit for a given application. Component-based styles are not without drawbacks, but the system has remained the go-to strategy for many teams. Use this approach:.
They may draw polarized opinions, but atomic frameworks continue to advance and prove the usefulness of this approach. Thanks to its composability and less opinionated concepts, an atomic framework can be an ideal candidate:.
Before we begin, it is essential to note that CSS is a functional language that enables responsive designs on a website. Its usage is what determines the advantages and disadvantages of CSS.
How much time do you think it will take to make the size changes to all those 40 pages? A lot! This is where CSS comes to the rescue as a savior.
It offers you to define the changes in a single CSS file and reference all those 40 pages to that same file. As a result, your entire website will start reflecting the size changes. All in all, it dramatically simplifies page making and reduces time spent. Considering our very own example from the first advantage above, imagine that you have to make more fluid changes to your content.
If it were not for CSS, you would have to take notes of changes made to one page and reference it while you make changes to another page, constantly going back and forth. Imagine the amount of exhaustion and brain activity required to justify the consistency of these changes. However, with CSS, your changes are well applied consistently. Code density on your website contributes to its speed. Just so you know, that visitors are quick to abandon a website if it takes more than seconds to load.
Only a few code lines are required to make changes to a large number of pages on the website with CSS. Since there is minimal code, the website database remains uncluttered, eliminating any website loading issues. Also, pages start to load faster when the browser caches the stylesheet on the first visit to the site, and further, on subsequent visits, only the data is loaded, which is beneficial to page speed optimization.
CSS changes are device-friendly. As people use a wide range of smart devices to access websites over the internet, there is a need for responsive web design. Usually, websites based on CSS serve to make your web pages more adaptive and display in the same manner on all devices. CSS lets you define changes in the position of web elements present on a page.
From a user point of view, a responsive template used in a Smartphone or touch pad viewport is fully usable and in most cases easier to use than a scaled down version that the device produces. Even if the user opens the template in a large screen, but doesn't have the browser fully open, the template adapts itself to the browser size, a horizontal scrollbar isn't apparent and the further the browser window is decreased in size the template responds as such.
When we build a website using responsive technology we create a website that is using the latest technology and simultaneously we future proof the website, who knows what is to come next in the world of web design. The development of a responsive template requires more technical know-how, more testing, which in turn means more time is required. End-user technical training is possibly required if the website, where the template resides, is solely controlled and modified by the owner and not the development team.
The latest technology is used to develop a responsive template which means browser compatibility problems arise, support for HTML5 and CSS3 is still limited, be it a desktop browser or a mobile device browser.
The majority of responsive templates that solely used media queries and one HTML source code set-up can cause loading time problems on mobile devices, more specific, smartphones, due to the amount of calls to the server. Although responsive templates are built to respond to the viewport of a device some elements need to be removed from the viewport.
A prefab CSS framework can be a great help or serious hindrance. This article will give proper coverage to both sides of the fence by looking at common arguments for and against using a CSS framework.
Everything you'll ever need in your design resource toolkit. Explore Design Resources. CSS frameworks are meant to speed up and simplify the development of complex websites. In order to accomplish this feat, CSS frameworks contain predefined libraries of code that contain a ton of options for you to use in your HTML. For instance, grid-based frameworks usually contain several classes that are a set number of pixels wide to make it easy to create multi-columned layouts.
It gives you a solid foundation to build your project on top of, with an easy-to-use grid, sensible typography, useful plugins, and even a stylesheet for printing. It was built to help designers write CSS faster and more efficient.
0コメント